Rating: - A unique take on the Batman saga
I have doubts this movie (or its sequels) fit in with Warner Brother's previous Batman series of movies (though there are some similarities). I also doubt it fits in with the TV series (which has far fewer similarities).

If there is a weak link, it is the time spent on the origins development. The comic books give the impression that Bruce Wayne trained after his parents' murder getting physically prepared for his role as Batman. The TV series didn't deal with the subject at all and the movie series barely touched on it. (The excellent animated series did deal with the subject to a small extent.) This movie dealt more with it, with some similarities to the Matrix in the process.

I will admit I had to adjust to Michael Caine in the role of Alfred. Of course Caine did a great job with the role -- we're talking about Michael Caine, after all -- but looks wise he did not fit my image of the role. Christian Bale did as good as anybody as Bruce Wayne, though Michael Keaton was my favorite Bruce Wayne.

One major difference is the description of Chill, who orphaned Bruce Wayne. This movie made him believable as a thug, and not as cold-blooded as the comic book crook or the pre-Joker Jack Napier of the previous series (both of which contemplated killing the boy, which Chill did not). I won't touch any more of the story to keep from spoiling it any further.

The one interesting thing was that it showed Jim Gordon in his pre-commissioner days. It developed the relationship between Gordon and Batman that was basically ignored in the previous movie series and taken for granted in the TV series. Another interesting thing was the insertion of the comic book/animated series villain Scarecrow as a minor villain.

In short, the acting was great -- in addition to Caine there are great performances by Liam Neeson (who I didn't recognize), Rutger Hauer, and Morgan Freeman. The action started slow but ended up on pace. The special effects were more spectacular than in the previous movies. I probably would not take children nine or under (an arbitrary age) to see it, and would accompany any minor before seeing it. To me, though, there seemed to be less sex than in the previous series, which was a plus to me.

This ended with a minor cliff-hanger (the introduction of the Joker, another sign of independence from the previous movie series), enough to whet a person's appetite for "The Dark Knight", but not enough to keep them from sleep.

Television Show Collectibles

Movie Searches