|
Rating: -
I will dispense with the standard plot synopsis and, for the most part, a review of this movie. 14 years later, most of us looking at a special edition "Basic Instinct" DVD already like it enough to at least show interest in possibly buying this. My question was, is it worth it to replace my old "Basic Instinct" DVD with a new one?
By my count this is the 4th DVD transfer of this film (there was a bare-bones DVD of the theatrical release, then a special edition with extras, then the unrated directors cut special edition with the same extras (that one had the dumb "ice pick box," but was eventually, and is now, available in a standard box whose cover art looks just like all the other releases (including the original VHS release): All white box, torso-and-up shot of Stone and Douglas whith her clawing his back), and now this one that still retains that same image of the stars, but now it is inside the lettering of the title).
I mention this for two reasons.
The first may not matter much to amazon and other on-line shoppers, but here's what happened to me while walking around Best Buy today: I already owned the "bare-bones" version (I picked it up for 5 bucks brand new at least 5 years ago, so this has never been a movie one needed to drop a lot on to own), but I wanted the unrated director's cut I saw advertised in the Best Buy weekend circular. I picked it up off the shelf and saw there was the older '02 special edition release right next to it for $5.99. I was not crazy about spending $15 (not that that is a terrible price, mind you) on a movie I already owned so I decided to go with the '02 version (I'll get to the comparison between the two in a moment - that is reason #2). I got home and found out it was the special edition alright, but it was the original theatrical version. It had extras and such, but the point of replacing the thing in the first place was to get the director's cut. So I went back to Best Buy and, sure enough, because the boxes look the same except for a tiny-worded "director's cut" in the bottom corner, I grabbed the wrong one. The director's cut was there and it to was also only $5.99 (and because of some additional sale I was unaware of it rang up as something like $4.40). So BE CAREFULl WHEN SELECTING A VERSION OF THE FILM. The ice-pick box, dumb as it looked on the DVD shelf, seems to be gone so there is no easy way to tell all these apart. You gotta do a little reading. "Special Edition" doesn't automaticly mean "director's cut." (Especially for a DVD that has had as many similar - and similar looking - releases as this one.)
That's my first point. The second is to inform you that, in comparing this new version "special edition director's cut" with the $5 version I got, the only difference, besides the newly arranged cover art, is that there is an interview and an introduction by Sharon Stone. That's it. Other than that, it has the same bonuses, commentaries, etc. And that is said if that even matters to you in the first place. If you just want the movie, there is no reason to opt for this new, more expensice release; or if you already have the director's cut, replace it with this one - unless you really want to hear from Sharon Stone (that's her now, mind you, not 1992 - I'm just sayin'...)
So why was this made then? "Basic Instinct 2" hits theatres in a few weeks. I'll reserve judgment on that move until I see it, but I can judge this as a cash grab. I'm not angry though. "Basic Instinct" is hardly the first film to pull this stunt and I almost wish that some of the movies I really loved had just one "special edition" or update from its first DVD incarnation, not to mention 4 or more. I would just hope there would be something that sets them apart from the previous version.
That's not the case here.
* One quick observation I could not resisit mentioning: It is ironic that a movie as notorious for its graphic sex and violence as "Basic Instinct" that the Amazon info lists its rating as simply "Unrated for drug use and laguage." :)
Rating: -
This is a highly forgettable movie which made a "Star " out of Sharon Stone for reasons which I can't quite fathom. The only thing I can remember about this movie is the Interrogation Scene whcih should appeal to every 16 year old High School Geek's sexual fantasies.I give this movie 5 stars because thankfully Ms. Stone and Mr. Douglas are rarely seen in movies anymore these days!
Rating: -
Why do studio keep on doing this, there was the unrated version, than the one with the ice pick. Now this one. But it's not being released until Basic Instinct 2 comes out.
This version doesn't have the essay by Camille Paglia. How many version do I have to buy. And studios wonder why profits are down. Thank goodness for bittorrent.
Rating: -
I hadn't seen this in a while until recently, & it still had me on my toes. This came out when I was in high school, but I didn't see it until after I had graduated... but I remember the hype about it being "racy". I really didn't know what to think of it at first... but after seeing it a few times, it grew on me. Maybe it's the sex... or crime drama thriller... killers getting away with killing... or a combination of the above. I remember hearing & reading about Stone's mixed-review performance beforehand, but after seeing it for myself, I personally thought it fit the character. You can never really trust her, although at times you almost want to. I hadn't even really seen Douglas in any movies before this. If you liked this, than Fatal Attraction is a must see as well (I didn't see FA until after this one). Throw in here a beautiful score by Jerry Goldsmith (which as a classical musician I noticed), as well what has become one of my favorite dance tracks since I heard it in high school, La Tour's "Blue" from the dance club scene with Roxy.
As far as flaws, I have to agree with another reviewer about the realism of her antics as she's getting questioned. What's wrong with these guys, & what really makes her so special? They really haven't seen anything like her, as the polygraph guy says? That's the main thing that bothered me, but it's a movie, & as long as you know that, don't take it too seriously. There are lots of funny moments, esp. with Curran's friend Gus... "that's that magna cum laude ***** that done fried up your brain!" I didn't know this was the same director as Starship Troopers & Showgirls, but this is by far better of the 3. I think this is one of those movies where you either like it or you don't. Again, movies aren't always supposed to be realistic, so just appreciate it for what it is. Some movies keep you watching it more than once, & others don't... & you don't always have to have a valid reason why. For me, this is just one of those movies :)
Rating: -
I did not see this movie on first release in 1992, but just watched it last night after seeing the scorching trailer for the upcoming sequel. I figured maybe it was about time to check out the first film.
There are plot holes galore. Acting that must have seemed very "serious" in 1992 now borders on camp. And yet, it is mesmerising. This is one beautiful looking piece of trash...and I mean trash in the most fun sense of the word. I can see why this film made Sharon Stone a sensation, and not because of the crotch-flash. She's definitely the best thing in it, other than Jerry Goldsmith's haunting and perfect score.
All in all, it doesn't add up to much but sure is fun to watch and nice to look at.
Television Show
Collectibles
Movie Searches
|
|
|
Search for posters,
art prints, photos, collectables, merchandise, toys, t-shirts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

Join the Nielsen//NetRatings Research Panel and you could win a new car, a dream vacation, a dream home makeover or $50,000 Cash!
TV Guide
Program listings, celebrity profiles, industry
gossip, movie reviews, puzzle.
More
Entertainment
& TV Magazines
This site is
Hosted
by Bluehost
Read
my Bluehost Review

Original Superhero & other designs for t-shirts, bumper
stickers, prints, mugs, and other cool merchandise. |
|