|
Rating: -
Little Women is based on the 1868 book by Louisa May Alcott, that was in turn based on her own family and sisters. Alcott was a daughter of noted Transcendentalist Amos Bronson Alcott and Abigail May Alcott. She had three sisters: one elder (Anna Alcott Pratt) and two younger (Elizabeth Sewall Alcott and Abigail May Alcott Nieriker). The family moved to Boston in 1834 or 1835 where her father established an experimental school and joined the Transcendental Club with Ralph Waldo Emerson and Henry David Thoreau.
Transcendentalism was a group of new ideas in literature, religion, culture, and philosophy that emerged in New England in the early to middle 19th century. Transcendentalism began as a protest against the general state of culture and society at the time. Among transcendentalists' core beliefs was an ideal spiritual state that 'transcends' the physical and empirical and is only realized through the individual's intuition, rather than through the doctrines of established religions. The best known work coming out of this movement was Thoreau's Walden; or Life in the Woods. Walden Pond itself is shown in Little Women in a scene where young Amy (Kirsten Dunst) is ice skating and falls in it. Talk about your skating on thin ice...
Jo March (Winona Ryder) is the second oldest sister, and she is clearly the one modeled after Louisa May Alcott herself. She is an aspiring writer who writes stories and plays that the sisters act out. This is a perfect vehicle for Winona Ryder, whose own unconventional upbringing and alternative views on private property are mirrored by the March family:
Josephine 'Jo' March: If lack of attention to personal finances is a mark of refinement, then I say the Marches must be the most elegant family in Concord!
Amy March is played by two actresses, as in the first part she is just a child (a young Kirsten Dunst), but later she grows up to be a painter (Samantha Mathis). The young Amy is quite a scene stealer, and like Sheridan's Mrs. Malaprop, she sometimes makes up or misuses words, to comic effect:
Younger Amy March: We've been expectorating you for hours!
Meanwhile, scion of the prosperous Laurence family, and therefore known as Laurie (Christian Bale), wonders aloud to his tutor (Eric Stolz) what exactly transpires within the neighbors' cloistered household:
John Brooke: Over the mysteries of female life there is drawn a veil best left undisturbed.
But young Laurie can't really leave the veil undisturbed, try as he might:
Jo: [as Jo and Laurie dance awkwardly at Belle Gardner's ball] I'm sorry! Meg always makes me take the gentleman's part at home! It's a shame you don't know the lady's part!
At one point, there is an epidemic of scarlet fever, and Amy is sent away to live with relatives to escape exposure:
Amy: I don't wanna die. I've never even been kissed. I've waited my whole to be kissed, and what if I miss it?
Laurie: I tell you what. I promise to kiss you before you die.
Though he becomes very close to them all, he is in love with Jo. But it is complicated, as she has him firmly ensconsed in the friend bag.
Laurie: I have loved you since the moment I clamped eyes on you. What could be more reasonable than to marry you?
Jo March: We'd kill each other.
Laurie: Nonsense!
Jo March: Neither of us can keep our temper-...
Laurie: I can, unless provoked.
Jo March: We're both stupidly stubborn, especially you. We'd only quarrel!
Laurie: I wouldn't!
Jo March: You can't even propose without quarreling.
He isn't going to take that without a fight, or a quarrel, more like it:
Laurie: Someday you'll find a man, a good man, and you'll love him, and marry him, and live and die for him. And I'll be hanged if I stand by and watch.
Jo is unsatisfied with her life and so Marmee March (Susan Sarandon) (and who better to play such a role?), marvelous matriarch of the March menangerie, sends her off:
Marmee March: Oh, Jo. Jo, you have so many extraordinary gifts; how can you expect to lead an ordinary life? You're ready to go out and - and find a good use for your talent. Tho' I don't know what I shall do without my Jo. Go, and embrace your liberty. And see what wonderful things come of it.
In New York she meets a lot of interesting people foremost of whom is a handsome professor from Germany, Friedrich Bhaer (Gabriel Byrne). He takes her to see Georges Bizet's opera The Pearl Fishers, and while sitting in their vantage point perched high in the rafters backstage he translates for her:
Friedrich: Your heart understood mine. In the depth of the fragrant night, I listened with ravished soul to your beloved voice. Your heart understood mine.
Of course though he is merely translating the opera, the words are also meant for Jo as well. He is a professor of philosophy, and he encourages her writing, but he feels like she is capable of more. When shown some of her work intended for a commercial audience he tells her so:
Friedrich: [having read Jo's latest book] There is *nothing* in this of the woman I am privileged to know.
He may be on to something. Jo is quite bursting with inspiration:
Jo: Late At night my mind would come alive with voices and stories and friends as dear to me as any in the real world. I gave myself up to it, longing for transformation.
More professorial advice:
Friedrich Bhaer: You must write from the depths of your soul!
Meanwhile Amy goes off to Europe with Aunt March to study painting. Laurie is also there, studying music, and the two meet:
Amy: Have you heard from Jo? She has befriended a German professor.
Laurie: I envy her happiness. I envy his happiness. I envy John Brooke for marrying Meg. I hate Fred Vaughn. And if Beth had a lover I would despise him too. Just as you have always known that you would never marry a pauper, I have always known that I belong to the March family.
Amy: I will not be loved for my family...
It is complictated, isn't it? As Professor Bhaer tells Jo while watching the opera:
Jo: What's going to happen?
Friedrich: The inevitable.
I thought I wasn't going to be able to enjoy this movie as it is intended for children, and female ones at that, but it was very entertaining. I wondered if some of the political issues had been shoehorned in by Winona and Sarandon, but looking into the background of author Alcott, those elements would have been there in the original book if Alcott had the freedoms we enjoy today. It is a prime example of where a story works on two levels simultaneously, with something for the kids, but also something for adults to ponder. Great period costumes and lush cinematography, especially the winter New England tableau. Interesting to see a young Kirsten Dunst, before Spiderman, as well as Christian Bale before he donned the Batman cape and cowl. As an interesting aside, there is a movie of the next book in the March family saga, Little Men. Here the character of Friedrich Bhaer was played by Christopher Sarandon, who divorced Susan but she kept his last name since then.
The Alcott family reminded me a bit of The Brontë sisters, who used to write their own little books and dramas, and then went on to produce such classic works of fiction as Charlotte Brontë's Jane Ayre and Emily Brontë's superb Wuthering Heights.
The film is dedicated to two persons, one of whom is Polly Klaas, the 12-year-old girl who was kidnapped from her Petaluma, California, home in 1993 and later found murdered. Winona Ryder, much of whose youth was spent in Petaluma, joined in the highly publicized search effort and made a number of emotional appeals for the child's safe return. Little Women was Polly's favorite book.
Films of Susan Sarandon
Dead Man Walking (1995) .... Sister Helen Prejean
Thelma & Louise (1991) .... Louise
Pretty Baby (1978) .... Hattie
The Rocky Horror Picture Show (25th Anniversary Edition) (1975) .... Janet Weiss
Films of Winona Ryder
A Scanner Darkly (2006) .... Donna Hawthorne
Reality Bites (10th Anniversary Edition) (1994) .... Lelaina Pierce
Heathers (1989) .... Veronica Sawyer
Films of Christian Bale
Equilibrium (2002) .... John Preston
Velvet Goldmine (1998) .... Arthur Stuart
Swing Kids (1993) .... Thomas Berger
Friedrich Bhaer: You must write from the depths of your soul!
Rating: -
Winona Ryder was nominated for an Oscar for her portrayal of Jo March and after you watch it, you can fully appreciate the intensity and vulnerability of her performance. While Jo is the heart of the story, this is an ensemble movie with some of the best actors alive. Kirsten Dunst simply shines as Amy, so much so that it is a disappointment when the second act roles around and she is replaced by the far less competent Samantha Manthis, who does not look like an older Kirsten Dunset at all. But Gabriel Byrne, the always-fascinating Christian Bale, Claire Danes, and Susan Sarandon more than make up for it.
I was only slightly disappointed by the director's commentary. Most of what she had to say was interesting and I truly enjoy the process of film-making, but she seemed to drag in some places, along with her commentary on the two deleted scenes and why they were deleted.
But the film itself captures the spirit of the novel in every way-- its music, its costuming, its art direction. It makes one long for the time when the English language was written and spoken as it is in Little Women.
Rating: -
I've loved this movie since I was a kid. Great performances by some great Actors. If you're up for seeing a young love-tortured Christian Bale, you will not be disappointed!!
Rating: -
i am a fortunate person. i had a 2nd grade teacher that turned me on to many of the classics of american literature. but it takes a lifetime to understand what many of these books are about. particularly 'little women'.
but if someone doesn't have a lifetime, then they can get a great adaptation of the material and view it as a film. such is the case with the most recent version of 'little women'.
the screenplay is a living thing, inspiring the musical which recently starred sutton foster on broadway. and the wise decision to not have a grown actress play amy as a child is even more fortunate. this role is split between kirsten dunst and samantha mathis and both are admirable. as are mary wickes as GREAT-aunt march and susan sarandon as the most warm and maternal abigail march of the many versions.
trini alvarado and winona ryder are both effective as meg and jo. in past versions, meg has always been a ravishing beauty (frances dee or janet leigh in particular) but alvarado makes more of the role by investing qualities of composure in her performance. ryder, while not as striking as katharine hepburn or brusque as june allyson, is still a capable and enchanting jo.
but the real movie-making performance is claire danes' beth. she and gilian armstrong keep beth ever present, even when the character is at her lowest ebb. i can't stop my eyes from filling with tears when she joins her family for christmas. and her final moments are once again enriched by that wonderful adapation of the novel's words. danes, in fact, is the only one of the young actresses that attempts a new-england accent.
my only criticism, on that note, is pronunciation of one word. marmee. the 'r' sound is like an 'h' if a person lives in new england. even to this day. it would be mah-mee. mah-mee. get it?
Rating: -
I love this movie; it's a classic in my household. Although it doesn't follow the book, it is a very good movie for all families and people to enjoy.
Television Show
Collectibles
Movie Searches
|
|
|
Search for posters,
art prints, photos, collectables, merchandise, toys, t-shirts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

Join the Nielsen//NetRatings Research Panel and you could win a new car, a dream vacation, a dream home makeover or $50,000 Cash!
TV Guide
Program listings, celebrity profiles, industry
gossip, movie reviews, puzzle.
More
Entertainment
& TV Magazines
This site is
Hosted
by Bluehost
Read
my Bluehost Review

Original Superhero & other designs for t-shirts, bumper
stickers, prints, mugs, and other cool merchandise. |
|